RESUMO
In developing countries, manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) has surfaced as the cost-effective alternative to phacoemulsification. The Simcoe irrigation-aspiration cannula was developed nearly 40 years ago and is still the most frequently employed tool for cortex aspiration. Although it stands unsurpassed, here we attempt to introduce an addition to the existing Simcoe cannula to achieve a dynamic and controlled vacuum with the added advantage of less physical strain and an effective volume of aspiration. The vacuum-assisted cortex removal device is based on a simple spring action mechanism, where the relaxation of the spring pushes the plunger up and thereby generates a controlled vacuum.
Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Oftalmologia , Facoemulsificação , Humanos , Vácuo , Análise Custo-BenefícioRESUMO
Purpose: To analyze the reasons for delay in cataract surgery in patients with advanced cataracts during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter questionnaire study which included patients with mature cataract, nuclear sclerotic cataract grade IV, and cataracts with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) <5/60, during the COVID-19 pandemic from December 2020 to April 2021. Reasons for delay in presentation to the hospital were analyzed. Results: One thousand four hundred seventy two patients were recruited with advanced cataracts. Absence of ophthalmic care nearby (44.2%), lack of awareness regarding elective surgeries (42.6%), lack of public transportation (37%), fear of contracting COVID-19 (23.4%), and waiting for outreach camps (20.4%) were found to be the reasons behind the delay in cataract surgery. 53.7% of the patients had worsening of defective vision and 55.3% of them had difficulty in carrying out activities of family living. 30.8% of the patients faced difficulty in commuting and 8.4% of the patients suffered a fall during this pandemic due to worsening of the visual acuity. Conclusion: The lockdown imposed during the pandemic has created a significant backlog of patients who are progressing to advanced cataracts due to lack of ophthalmic care nearby, lack of awareness regarding elective surgeries, lack of public transportation, and no outreach camps. Proactive measures to deal with this backlog are of utmost need to prevent blindness due to cataract.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Catarata , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Catarata/complicações , Catarata/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in reduction of patient volumes in Ophthalmology. With only emergency surgical procedures being performed with few elective surgical procedures, surgical volumes are at an all-time low. This has resulted in decreased surgical training opportunities for trainee surgeons. We developed a simple, cost-effective, 3D printed model eye - RetiSurge - for "Dry Lab" vitreoretinal surgery training. The model incorporates a retinal film that can be changed, making it suitable for multiple uses. The RetiSurge model can be used to practice visualization, instrument manipulation and endolaser photocoagulation. RetiSurge can be sterilized by ethylene oxide and is safe for use inside the operating room. RetiSurge is a simple, cost-effective, and reusable model eye for early training in Vitreoretinal surgery.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Modelos Anatômicos , Oftalmologia/educação , SARS-CoV-2 , Cirurgia Vitreorretiniana/educação , Competência Clínica , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Índia/epidemiologia , Internato e ResidênciaRESUMO
Since the emergence of COVID pandemic, health workers have been facing major challenges every day. Ophthalmology practice has encountered countless modifications in the practice pattern not to jeopardize patient care and at the same time maintain all safety measures to reduce transmission. One such modification we made was the Safe Slit-Lamp Shield (SSS) which has been found to be extremely protective in differentiation to other available shield. Although SSS has a larger surface area when compared to already available shields, it won't compromise the comfort of the clinician at the same time gives satisfactory protection.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Segurança de Equipamentos , Ergonomia , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Equipamentos de Proteção , Microscopia com Lâmpada de Fenda/instrumentação , Resinas Acrílicas , Aerossóis , COVID-19 , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Lâmpada de FendaAssuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Descontaminação/métodos , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/farmacologia , Oxidantes/farmacologia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Raios Ultravioleta , Ventiladores Mecânicos , COVID-19 , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Hospitais Especializados , Humanos , Oftalmologia , Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória , SARS-CoV-2 , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
AIM: To understand the barriers in utilisation of low vision assistive products (LVAPs) from the perspective of patients with low vision. METHODS: Patients referred to low vision clinic in a tertiary eye care hospital in India who were prescribed LVAPs but were un-willing to accept the products were interviewed using questionnaires. Data pertaining to the age, diagnosis, gender, occupation, preferred LVAPs, patient's perception of vision loss and the primary reason for non-acceptance of LVAPs were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 235 among the 413 patients who noticed improvement in visual performance with LVAPs were unwilling to utilise these products. The questionnaire revealed that 53% of the patients who felt they were not candidates for LVAPs were experiencing severe visual impairment (p < 0.02). Non-acceptance was highest (68.6%) in patients < 15 years of age. The most common causes of non-acceptance were social stigma in patients < 40 years (41.3%; p < 0.0001), fear of loss of employment in patients 41-60 years (26.6%; p < 0.01) and low necessity in patients > 60 years (25%; p < 0.001). Denial of the magnitude of their illness was more common in patients above 60 years (16.5%). Non-acceptance rate was lowest for macular disorders (39.6%) and highest for retinitis pigmentosa (81%). Among devices, hand and stand magnifiers had the lowest non-acceptance rate (41%). Telescopes and electronic devices had the highest rate of non-acceptance (92% and 89%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Reasons for poor utilisation of LVAPs are multifactorial extending beyond affordability or accessibility. Knowledge of these barriers can help in creating content for awareness campaigns among patients, healthcare professionals and general society. Further research is necessary on the psychological and psycho social contributors to this process.